BRITAIN'S BILL IS DUE. WHY THE UK HAS REFUSED TO TALK ABOUT BIAFRA:

Written by Mike Arnold.

Word is, my biggest sin in Washington isn’t what I’ve said about the genocide.

It’s what I’ve said about the British.

More specifically, I had the audacity to publicly say the B word: Biafra.

Not as an advocate for separation, mind you — only for historical context. I have never advocated for Biafran secession. I have communicated their righteous grievances. 

I have also called on them repeatedly to lay down that talk for now and band together across tribal lines to end the evil regime strangling the entire nation. Only when the stranglehold is broken can every people group draw their own map in peace.

But I believe — fundamentally, non-negotiably — that every people group has the right to choose their own path. And what the British did to them is a vast, horrific, ongoing evil. 

And apparently, that is the most dangerous thing I can say in Washington.

More dangerous than naming the genocide  and those behind jt. 

More dangerous than exposing the lobbyists and pharisaical swamp creatures.

Because this one hangs a starvation genocide around some very important limey necks.

So let’s talk about that.

What Britain Did

In 1914, Lord Lugard drew a line around two incompatible civilizations — the Islamic Caliphate of the North and the Christian and traditional peoples of the South — called it Nigeria, and handed it to the Crown. Nobody was asked.

The contraption was designed from birth to keep the Caliphate in administrative control and the oil flowing to London.

When the Southeast tried to leave in 1967 — after tens of thousands of Igbos were slaughtered in northern pogroms — Britain showed its hand.

Their own declassified Foreign Office documents state it plainly:

“The sole immediate British interest in Nigeria is that the Nigerian economy should be brought back to a condition in which our substantial trade and investment in the country can be further developed, and particularly so we can regain access to important oil installations.”

That’s not my accusation. That’s their confession.

Shell-BP — part owned by the British government — controlled 84% of Nigeria’s oil production. Two thirds of it was in Biafran territory.

So Harold Wilson’s Labour government secretly armed the Nigerian federal military. Millions of rounds of ammunition. Hundreds of machine guns. Thousands of mortar and artillery bombs. Aircraft. Armored personnel carriers.

While standing in Parliament and lying about it.

Nigeria imposed a blockade on Biafra. Food couldn’t get in. Medicine couldn’t get in. The famine was not an accident. It was the strategy.

When parliamentarians begged Wilson to stop — estimating two million deaths from starvation — he rebuffed them. Two days later he secretly agreed to supply Nigeria with aircraft for the first time.

When images of skeletal Biafran children shocked the world, Wilson called it “propaganda.”

Up to three million people died. Most of them children.

Britain pocketed the oil.

They have never apologized. Never acknowledged it in a school textbook. Never paid a single penny.

What They Owe

Here is a reasonable, precedented tally. Not a number pulled from the air — a calculation built category by category from documented facts.

Oil Revenue — Biafran Territory

Nigeria has earned approximately $600 billion in oil revenue since the 1960s. Two thirds of Shell-BP’s operations were in Biafran territory. At a 60% territorial share — $360 billion. Adjusted for inflation from 1967 dollars to today — conservatively $2.5 trillion.

Wrongful Death — Up to 3 Million People

International wrongful death precedents — Holocaust reparations, ICC awards, comparable genocide settlements — range from $100,000 to $500,000 per life. At a conservative $500,000 per person — $1.5 trillion.

Structural Damages — 112 Years of the Contraption

The 1914 amalgamation. The installation of the Caliphate as the administrative class. The 1960 handover engineered to protect British commercial dominance. The ongoing genocide that architecture enables to this day. Caribbean nations are currently pursuing $10 trillion from Britain for slavery reparations. Nigeria’s case is more recent, more direct, and more documentable. Conservative estimate — $1 trillion.

Obstruction of humanitarian aid. Arms supply to an aggressor. Compounding interest on all of the above — add $500 billion minimum.

The Total

Approximately $6 trillion.

Twice Britain’s annual GDP.

The largest reparations claim in human history.

Every penny of it sourced from declassified British government documents. Harold Wilson’s own words. Shell-BP’s own records. The Foreign Office’s own confessions.

A free Biafra — or any legitimate successor government representing the Southeast — would have full legal standing to file this claim before the International Court of Justice.

Which is exactly why the British don’t want anyone talking about Biafra.

And exactly why they don’t want me in that briefing room.

Now you know why this is the forbidden topic.

Rise Biafrans,

Rise