Fact Checked: IGBO UKWU WERE NRI SLAVE; Origin and History of Igbo Ukwu - Onyeji Nnaji
Copied from the,
T.C. Shaw’s archaeological finds dominated historians’ writings about Igbo Ukwu in the manner that almost none gave attention to issues bothering on the history of Igbo Ukwu. The inhabitants also, overtaken by the conviviality that the finds brought, seized the opportunity to conceal their history. It was though a thing of surprise to historians and archaeologists, witnessing the finds that upturned the hierarchy already bestowed on the Ife and Benin over their Igbo neighbour. It did not only upturn the hierarchy, it forced history to resume a rewriting stage with Igbo at the top. It all begun with the stupefied discovery made by Isaiah Anozie within his compound. He was digging a well when he accidentally stumbled on some bronze ornaments. The ornaments looked strange to him, but little did he know that he was dwelling in a compound with bronze library underneath. Concentrating on the location, he unearthed more utensils that he found valuable. This event took effect in 1938.
In 1939, the British Commissioner of Oka
district, Frank W. Carpenter arrived in Oka. As time glided, he became aware of
the finds and approached the Anozie family for the samples of the bronze. In
1948 he proceeded for Nairobi where he worked for the Labour Commission. In
1956, F.W. Carpenter presented objects from a hoard found at the site of Igbo Ukwu
to the British Museum in London. Other parts were offered for sale at Sotheby's
2 December 1957, about 140 to 147. They were later withdrawn and sold to the
museum in Lagos. It was about this time that T.C. Shaw gained the invitation by
the Department of Antiquity to come for the excavation. Shaw’s finds were
numerous. He unearthed the burial ornaments of Nri priests. With all these
found within Igbo Ukwu, they became presumptuous that they may be the oldest
Igbo people that ever lived. They recovered themselves a little the moment Shaw
told them that the land that bore the excavation may have belonged to the
Oraeri people in the past. Shaw himself reported that,
They (Oreri people) also said that the ground where the
excavations were taking place used to lie in Oreri, but that the Igbo-Ukwu
people had captured it from them. I collected traditions in Igbo-Ukwu also
which confirmed the story. I mentioned this tradition in my interim report on
the excavations but was strongly taken to task for doing so at a meeting of the
Igbo-Ukwu Local Council in 1964, to discuss a project for a museum, since it
was felt that any statement might endanger Igbo-Ukwu’s claim to the land.
Great altercation between different members of the council
followed, finally quelled by the Chairman’s firm pronouncement: Of course,
everybody knows that the Oreri people used to be on that land and that we drove
them back in war, and therefore we hold the land by right of conquest (Unearthing, 94).
If the Oraeri were originally the owner of the
bronze site, we cannot ask how it became Igbo Ukwu’s since the chairman has
said they took it as war spoil. The question that should agitate minds is, “Who
were the Igbo Ukwu?” an answer to this very question will settle, not only
matters about their identity but also, issues connected to the truth about the
name of their progenitor. And when these matters are solved, those who once
questioned whether Nri is originally the owner of the civilization unearthed in
Igbo Ukwu will have reasons to reconcile their thoughts with the truth placed
before them.
I have shown the comment of W.F. Carpenter
while discussing the Oraeri above. It is worthy of note that the center of the
attraction that the Nri area had was simply that there was a spiritualist who
healed people, propitiate their sins and reintegrated them back to their
society. This multi-gifted effigy was the Eze Nri
who dwelt in Nri. Because of him, people who were chased out of their community
for one reason or the other assuredly found refuge in the kingdom. In Nri, they
lived as free as other inhabitants. This was so because the Nri priest was in
the mission of reconciling the world back to Chukwu. This was the same train
that brought both Igbo Ukwu and Oraeri among others of their kinds to Nri. But,
unlike the Oraeri, Igbo Ukwu situation appeared like they were sold out to Nri.
This could be the reason why, even hitherto, Igbo Ukwu could not lay hand on a
particular name as belonging to their progenitor. What this means, invariably, is that Igbo
Ukwu does not have a history of their own.
It is possible for any people to forget the
name of their progenitor or the possible place he had migrated from. But, in
most cases, where the history of any people is forgotten, there is usually
certain pieces of the same history scattered into the history of the
surrounding. In this condition, it may not be serial. In such a way, anybody
trying to undertake a study of such a people’s tradition would have to undergo
the task of gathering those pieces and sizing them up with the measures of
time. We met such a situation with the history of Nri herself as shown above.
The excerpt below explains the situation better.
where there is a related historical contiguity
(such as one historical element giving birth to others around it) such
contiguity can be vividly specified as proof of relationship but may not have
indebt information bothering on the continual process that had sustained the
contiguous offspring’s oral tradition.
With the help of Oka tradition, we were able to
recover Nri history. Although, Oka oral tradition did not provide us with indebt
information bothering on the continual process that had sustained Nri history
in its generational series, it gave us the directions to uncover and recover
Nri tradition. Igbo Ukwu did not have any of these. No community within and
outside Nri kingdom could give any account of Igbo Ukwu, it doesn’t matter how
succinct it may be. They claimed that they have lost the name of their
ancestor, his migration route or the circumstance that led him to Nri. History
sometimes presents some people very ugly. Yet at that, the inheritors of such
ugly tradition do not always discard it completely. All that Igbo Ukwu could
remember was a claim of one man called “Igbo.” He migrated from somewhere (not
mention, no direction spelt out) with his brother, Amaekwulu, who subsequently
founded another settlement which could not be remembered or located. The issue
is, they do not want people to know that they were brought from unknown place
to live in Nri either as recluse or as slaves. Nri had the tradition of
assimilating slaves and allow them to live as normal people; we have mentioned
this severally.
Another staring reason that appears to support
the view that Igbo Ukwu ancestor might be a slave is their name. When Igbo Ukwu
gained settlement at the part of Nri area which W.F. Carpenter described as
“The grave yard of Nri kings”, they were called a different thing from the name
they became known with after the finds was made in the area. They were called
“Igbo Nkwor”. This was their original name. This name, according to the Igbo
tradition, is relatively derogatory. When any people are denoted with such a
reference, whet the speaker did not want to verbally express is that such a
people are slaves. Igbo Nkwor is the best way Igbo euphemize slave. Another
term used to euphemize such denotation is “Aka Ishi”. This is mostly used by the
Nkanu people of Enugwu. When they refer any people as “Ndu eka ishi” (a people
with six fingers), what they mean is that such a people are slaves. In Igbo
Ukwu case, they were called “Ndi Igbo Nkwor”, meaning slaves or descendants of
slaves. It was W.F. Carpenter who baptized them into Igbo Ukwu.
When Carpenter became involved in the
unearthing of the archaeological finds in Igbo Ukwu, he was the District
Commissioner of Oka division, residing in Oka. He was not comfortable with the
term Igbo Ukwu were addressed with. Having spent time in Igbo land,
particularly Oka who had shown strict concern about slaves, he got to have a
clue of what the term, Igbo Nkwor, could connote. So, during his subsequent
meeting with the inhabitants, Carpenter suggested to them that their name did
not sound welcoming in the Igbo society base on his knowledge. He openly told
them that the name connotes the idea of them being slaves. Then, he suggested
that it would be preferable if they could change the second word, “Nkwor”, to “Ukwu”, since it imprints the meaning of greatness. Therefore, they
can be referred to as Igbo Ukwu, meaning, the great Igbo. The inhabitants
accepted this suggestion since it would scrape certain aspects of their inhuman
threat. They accepted Carpenter’s view and wedded it into their name. from then
hence, they began to refer to themselves as the Igbo Ukwu.
W.F. Carpenter got his idea from Oka
communities. During his days in the area, he witnessed and learnt how Oka
operate. Their meeting hours were being announced by Ikoro, just like every
other Igbo communities. When the Ikoro of the Oka people (especially at Nkwo
Imoka Square) sounded, it addressed Okain the following way,
“Igbo ukwu, Igbo ukwu!
Nnamenyi!
Igbo ukwu, Igbo ukwu, Igbo ukwu!
Nnamenyi!”
What the Ikolo said was:
Mighty town of the Igbo
people! Mighty town of the Igbo people!!
Your ancestors are great like the
elephant!
Your ancestors are great like the
elephant!!
“Igbo Ukwu”, as the Ikoro mentioned, is another
term for the Oka word, “Igbulukwu,”. This used to be the
appellation used by the Oka people in those days. It was the traditional
praise-name of Oka, used in times of stress and acts of power. Whenever this
was heard, all Oka quickly assembled to deal with whatever had arisen. Oka
elders clearly told me that there is no historical evidence of this appellation
in connection with other town of that name. meaning, it has no connection
whatsoever with the name Igbo Ukwu as a settlement. Carpenter enquired of the
meaning of the language of the Ikoro. He later used it to baptize Igbo Ukwu
from their slavery connotation of “Ndi Igbo Nkwor”.

Comments
Post a Comment