Kanu: Lawyer raises concerns over trial procedure and defence timeline

File: IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu and lawyer Aloy Ejimakor in a court session.

Lead counsel to the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Aloy Ejimakor, has raised concerns over aspects of the ongoing trial involving his client, Nnamdi Kanu, particularly regarding time allowed for the defence to present its case

Ejimakor, in a statement, said the defence was given a limited period to open its case after the prosecution closed its presentation in June 2025, following the testimony of five witnesses since the trial began in March.

He said that after the dismissal of a no-case submission, the court scheduled six days for the defence to begin its case. According to him, Kanu indicated interest in self-representation after consultation with his legal team and requested additional time to prepare and call witnesses, but the request was not granted.

The lawyer expressed concern over the disparity in time allocated to the prosecution and the defence, arguing that sufficient time is necessary to prepare a case effectively.

He referenced constitutional provisions under Section 36(6)(b) and (c) of the 1999 Constitution, which provide for adequate time and facilities for the preparation of a defence and the right of an accused person to defend himself or through legal representation.

Ejimakor also noted that issues relating to jurisdiction raised during the proceedings were yet to be resolved before further steps were taken.

He maintained that such matters are fundamental in judicial proceedings and should ordinarily be addressed before continuation of a trial.

The lawyer said the defence was unable to proceed under the current schedule and called for consideration of fair trial standards as guaranteed under the law.

He added that adherence to due process remains essential to ensuring justice in the matter.