Blockades and fees: Why are the US’s actions in Hormuz legal while Iran’s are not? - interview
The United States’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz can be legal, even if the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) demands unimpeded passage through the vital waterway, so long as it respects the terms of the San Remo Manual, Adv. Yoav Harris of Harris & Co. Maritime Law Office explained to The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.
The manual demands that belligerents and neutral states be made fully aware of the blockade, that the blockade be effective, that it be enforced impartially against vessels from all nations, that it not be established for the sole purpose of starving civilians, and that humanitarian relief be allowed to reach the civilian population if it is inadequately provided for.
The US blockade came after Iran announced its own blockade of the Strait of Hormuz on March 4, 2026, shortly after the United States and Israel began striking the Islamic Republic.
Although both countries announced blockades, the actions are not viewed as equivalent under international law.
Comments
Post a Comment