Scott Peterson's death sentence overturned by California Supreme Court


Scott Peterson, right, with defense attorney Mark Geragos in Stanislaus Superior Court on May 2, 2003.
California's Supreme Court on Monday reversed the death sentence handed down to Scott Peterson for the 2002 deaths of his wife Laci and unborn son.
The high court found that the trial itself was fair and the murder convictions stand.
In an automatic appeal, which was first filed with the Supreme Court in 2012, the court found that potential jurors were dismissed erroneously, in part due to their general objections to the death penalty.
    "While a court may dismiss a prospective juror as unqualified to sit on a capital case if the juror's views on capital punishment would substantially impair his or her ability to follow the law, a juror may not be dismissed merely because he or she has expressed opposition to the death penalty as a general matter," the opinion states.
    The case has been remanded to a lower court to determine Peterson's penalty.
    Laci, who was seven months pregnant, disappeared from her Modesto home just before Christmas 2002 and was reported missing by her husband.
    In the early days of the monthslong search for Laci, a woman who had been having an affair with Peterson came forward. In April 2003, Laci's body and that of her son washed up in San Francisco Bay. Scott Peterson was arrested shortly thereafter.
    A young child stops to look at a makeshift memorial and a missing person's banner offering a half-million dollar reward for the safe return of Laci Peterson at the East La Loma Park  in Modesto, California, on January 4, 2003.
    In November 2004, a jury found Peterson guilty of first-degree murder for Laci's death and second-degree murder for the death of the son, Conner. Peterson, now 47, was sentenced to death on December 13, 2004.
    Cliff Gardner, attorney for Peterson, thanked the Supreme Court for its decision.
    "We are grateful for the California Supreme Court's unanimous recognition that if the state wishes to put someone to death, it must proceed to trial only with a fairly selected jury. Prosecutors may not rely on a jury specifically organized by the state to return a verdict of death," Gardner said.

    "In deciding whether to seek a new death sentence, the question for prosecutors now is whether they can prove Mr. Peterson culpable for this crime to even a single juror seated through a fair jury selection process."
      John Goold, spokesperson for the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office, said, "We are reviewing the decision and will discuss with the victim's family."
      In 2019, Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on the death penalty in California. The moratorium is only in effect while Newsom is in office.


      Follow us on twitter (ajuede.com) or on Instagram (ajuedeman) for details of the global situation presently.

      Comments

      Popular posts from this blog

      Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has now treated 699 coronavirus patients with 100% success

      ORIGIN OF THE AKAN

      GARDEN OF EDEN FOUND IN AFRICA

      THE HISTORY AND ORIGIN OF THE ZULU PEOPLE

      BRIEF HISTORY OF NKALAHA.

      FIVE WAYS A WIFE CAN REST HER HUSBAND ON HER

      MYSTERY OF IGBO COSMOLOGY

      THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF UDI by Onyeji Nnaji

      THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF NSUKKA by Onyeji Nnaji

      ETHIOPIA:THE OLDEST PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE EAST